The US Senate just voted to reopen the government after a record-breaking shutdown, but the future of healthcare subsidies hangs in the balance. This decision, made on a Monday evening, ended the longest government shutdown in history, yet it leaves the fate of crucial healthcare subsidies uncertain. But what does this mean for everyday Americans? Let’s dive in.
After a grueling 40 days, a bipartisan effort saw eight Democrats joining almost all Republican Senators to pass a resolution. This resolution keeps the government running until January, setting the stage for a House vote on Wednesday. This comes despite significant opposition from many Democratic activists and nearly every House Democrat.
The core issue? Democrats were hoping to extend enhanced tax credits for the Affordable Care Act’s health insurance marketplace, a measure introduced by President Joe Biden during the COVID-19 pandemic. Roughly 24 million people rely on this marketplace for their insurance, according to KFF.
And this is the part most people miss… Open enrollment is currently underway, and some individuals are reporting their premiums have doubled or even tripled. KFF has warned that those receiving subsidies could see their premiums increase by as much as 114 percent.
This situation has caused a significant divide. Even Stefany Shaheen, the daughter of New Hampshire Senator Jeanne Shaheen, who helped broker the agreement, has voiced criticism. Senator Shaheen noted her daughter’s independence and extensive knowledge of the healthcare system.
The shutdown itself had tangible consequences. The Trump administration attempted to make the situation as difficult as possible, including legal battles to prevent the distribution of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) cutting thousands of flights.
Here’s where it gets controversial… President Donald Trump considered ending the filibuster after Democrats used it to block a continuing resolution in September.
While Senate Republicans have guaranteed a vote on extending the subsidies, their passage is not guaranteed. House Speaker Mike Johnson hasn’t committed to a vote either. Senate Democrats are skeptical about Republicans negotiating in good faith. Senator Chris Coons (D-Del.) highlighted Republicans’ historical opposition to the Affordable Care Act. During Trump’s first term, he tried to repeal the law, but it failed.
With Democrats holding only 47 Senate seats, they need to win over 13 Republicans. Some Republicans are already hesitant about extending the subsidies. Senator Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) questioned the value of continuing to fund insurance companies.
Some Republicans suggest giving money directly to voters instead of subsidies. Senator John Hoeven (R-N.D.) hinted at President Trump’s potential involvement. However, Senator Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) expressed skepticism about Republicans’ genuine concern for the insurance industry.
However, some Republicans are open to negotiation. Senator Susan Collins (R-Maine), who faces re-election, has sometimes voted with Democrats on healthcare. Senator Thom Tillis (R-N.C.), who is retiring, suggested the need to remove healthcare from the political cycle.
In addition to the continuing resolution, the deal allows for bipartisan spending bills, pays federal workers, and reverses reductions made by the Trump administration.
The big question is this: Despite the agreement, many Democrats are frustrated, especially after recent electoral successes. Senator Tim Kaine (D-Va.) believes Speaker Johnson will have to address the subsidies if they pass in a bipartisan way. Senator Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) believes an agreement is possible, despite the challenges.
What are your thoughts? Do you believe the government’s actions will adequately address the healthcare subsidy issue? Share your opinions in the comments below!